Evaluates compost quality using a novel rapid system, showing potential for agri-food waste valorization and soil health.
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the quality and limitations of compost produced in a novel automated closed system within 7–10 days compared to the compost produced under a traditional windrow system and a commercial organic fertilizer. Methods The compost maturity was evaluated using Solvita® stability test and phytotoxicity test. Mineral nitrogen (N) dynamics and enzyme activities were determined in unamended control soil and soil samples amended with the composts and organic fertilizer during a 91-days long incubation experiment. Results The compost from the closed system had a higher C:N and NH 4 + :NO 3 − ratio than the threshold for matured composts; however, its application at a rate of 5% (volume-based) did not affect cress germination. A significantly higher mineral N concentration was recorded in treatments with organic fertilizer (+ 17 to + 397%) and traditional compost (+ 11 to + 100%). In contrast, lower mineral N and higher dehydrogenase enzyme activities were recorded in the closed system compost than in the unamended control. Conclusion Applying the closed system compost in soils increased microbial activity while decreasing N availability, indicating the need for further research that synchronizes nitrogen availability with crop demand. The novel rapid-composting closed system shows the potential for valorizing farm waste, nutrient cycling, and improving soil health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gebremikael et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: