Literature review examines strategies to reduce out-of-pocket payments and catastrophic health spending in low-income households, suggesting policy improvements.
Objective: This paper aims to review, analyze, and discuss the incidence, severity, and effects of out-of-pocket-induced catastrophic health expenditure to understand its drivers and impacts, and to explore strategies to reduce it. Materials and Methods: The review involved in-depth electronic searches across four databases: Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Medline, and PubMed, to identify relevant research articles. The criteria filtered the data for relevance, suitability, and reliability, excluding duplicates, unrelated data on out-of-pocket payments and catastrophic health expenditure, and irrelevant sources, resulting in 62 articles. Results: The study found that household out-of-pocket health expenditures and catastrophic health spending are high in low- and middle-income countries. However, the effects of catastrophic health expenditures on low-income households are inconsistent, and factors such as family size, limited income, elderly members, hospitalization, unemployment, and healthcare expenses were acknowledged. These elements push out-of-pocket health spending above the 10% of household expenditures threshold, leading to poverty and impoverishment. Policy efforts to reduce out-of-pocket payment-induced catastrophic health spending have been ineffective, and how to better address these costs remains unclear given the diverse socioeconomic factors. Conclusion: The catastrophic health expenditure is often overlooked and remains underprioritized by decision-makers in many low- and middle-income countries. As these effects intensify, countries must develop health financing policies that protect people living in poverty from catastrophic health expenditure risk and, reduce excessive reliance on out-of-pocket payments for healthcare. Other policies include strengthening prepayment, targeted subsidies to enhance equity, and advance universal health coverage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ame et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: