PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2026Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases3 citations

Comparison of Short-term Outcomes Between Faricimab and High-Dose Aflibercept in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

View Full Paper
MSMizuho ShiratoriMMMaiko Maruyama-InoueYYYasuo Yanagi

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare the functional and morphologic outcomes of two treatments for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in treatment-naive patients.
  • Retrospective enrollment of 62 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
  • Patients received either 3 monthly loading doses of faricimab or high-dose aflibercept through intravitreal injection.
  • Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and macular fluid were assessed at 4, 8, and 16 weeks.
  • Both faricimab and high-dose aflibercept showed significant improvements in best-corrected visual acuity at various timepoints.
  • IVF group showed a significant improvement at 16 weeks (P = .004).
  • IVHDA group showed significant improvements at both 8 weeks (P = .001) and 16 weeks (P = .007).
  • At 16 weeks, 90.3% of IVF patients had a dry macula compared to 80.6% in the IVHDA group (P = .473).

Abstract

Purpose: To compare functional and morphologic outcomes after loading doses of faricimab and high-dose aflibercept for treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 62 consecutive patients (64 eyes) with nAMD whose initial visual acuity (VA) was ≤20/25. Patients received 3 consecutive monthly loading doses of intravitreal 6.0 mg/0.05 mL faricimab (IVF) or intravitreal 8.0 mg/0.07 mL high-dose aflibercept (IVHDA). Changes in best-corrected VA (BCVA) and fluid were assessed at 4, 8, and 16 weeks compared with baseline. Results: Two patients were excluded from the final analysis, yielding a total of 60 patients (62 eyes). In the IVF group (n = 31 eyes), the logMAR BCVAs at baseline, 4, 8, and 16 weeks were 0.40, 0.35, 0.33, and 0.30, respectively; significant improvement occurred at 16 weeks only ( P = .004 vs baseline). In the IVHDA group (n = 31 eyes), the logMAR BCVAs at the respective timepoints were 0.44, 0.36, 0.30, and 0.32; significant improvements occurred at 8 and 16 weeks ( P = .001 and P = .007, respectively, vs baseline). At 16 weeks, 90.3% of patients receiving IVF and 80.6% receiving IVHDA had dry macula ( P = .473). Conclusion: Significant BCVA improvements were achieved with both treatments, although improvement was faster with IVHDA. High rates of dry macula were achieved at 16 weeks in more patients in the IVF group than in the IVHDA group.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shiratori et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52e56f1e85e5c73bf1f78https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264261423302
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration2006 · 5,919 citations
  2. 2The emerging role of the Angiopoietin-Tie pathway as therapeutic target for treating retinal diseases2022 · 41 citations
  3. 3Comparison of functional and morphologic changes between brolucizumab and faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration2023 · 29 citations
  4. 4Causes and Prevalence of Visual Impairment Among Adults in the UnitedStates2004 · 2,644 citations
  5. 5Expert Opinion on Management of Intraocular Inflammation, Retinal Vasculitis, and Vascular Occlusion after Brolucizumab Treatment2020 · 153 citations