Objectives: The patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) 3.0 is a validated dual-perspective tool for scar evaluation. However, its utility is limited in non-English-speaking populations. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the patient component of POSAS 3.0 (generic and linear scar versions) into Hindi. Material and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from February to May 2025 at a tertiary care center. Standardized cross-cultural adaptation guidelines were followed for translation. A pilot study involving 30 Hindi-speaking adults (15 each with generic and linear scars) was performed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the translated versions. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated through Spearman correlation. Construct validity was assessed by comparing POSAS 3.0 (Hindi) scores with the pre-validated POSAS 2.0 (Hindi) using Spearman correlation, repeated measures analysis of variance, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The translated versions were well comprehended by the participants. Both versions demonstrated good internal consistency (α > 0.88) and strong test-retest reliability (ρ ≥ 0.94). The construct validity was supported by significant positive correlations with POSAS 2.0 scores and comparable performance across statistical analyses. Conclusion: The Hindi-translated patient component of POSAS 3.0 (generic and linear scar versions) is a reliable and valid instrument. It enables culturally appropriate and accurate scar assessment in Hindi-speaking populations, enhancing both clinical care and research applicability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kamal Deep Joshi
Anubhav Singh
Shilpi Saxena
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Command Hospital
Fistulacure
Tezpur Medical College & Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joshi et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52e75f1e85e5c73bf22a3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/jcas_253_2025