PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Scientific Reports1 citationsOpen Access

An improved lightweight YOLOv11 algorithm for weld surface defect detection

RZRunmei ZhangCPChenfei PanZCZihua Chen

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a more efficient model for detecting weld surface defects using YOLOv11.
  • Proposed a lightweight YOLOv11 model named YOLO-Air.
  • Integrated feature extraction with convolutional modules.
  • Embedded GSConv and VOV-GSCSP modules to minimize feature redundancy.
  • Designed a lightweight detection head to reduce model complexity.
  • Compared performance with baseline on two datasets.
  • Achieved a 1.3% improvement in mAP50 metric.
  • Reduced the number of parameters by 17.3%.
  • Lowered computational complexity by 31.7%.
  • Experimental results passed robustness tests.

Abstract

Industrial welding often exhibits some essential problems, such as unclear defect characteristics and complex background information. However, the existing defect detection models have relatively high costs and may be weak in weld surface defect detection. To address the problem, this paper proposes an improved lightweight YOLOv11 model for welding surface defect detection, called YOLO-Air. First, the model integrates the feature extraction module with the convolutional module to boost feature representation capability and optimize computational efficiency. Second, the GSConv and VOV-GSCSP modules are embedded in the neck network to reduce feature redundancy of spatial and channel dimensions, and then lower the computational load. Third, a lightweight detection head is designed as part of the detection network to further reduce model complexity. Lastly, we compare our proposed YOLO-Air model with the baseline on the Welding Defect Test-V2 and NEU-DET datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model yields superior performance for weld surface defect detection. Specifically, it improves the mAP50 metric by 1.3%, while reducing the number of parameters by 17.3% and the computational complexity by 31.7%.All key experimental data have passed robustness tests.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a67dd6f353c071a6f09dbchttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41568-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper