PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026The Journal of Immunology0 citations

HIV- and cytomegalovirus-specific human memory CD8+ T cells are activated and expanded independent of co-stimulatory signaling by T-cell receptor–specific immunotherapeutics

View Full Paper
CHChristopher HinerAMApril MuellerSGS. Garforth

Key Points

  • To identify the minimal signals necessary for activating and expanding antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells.
  • Utilized Immuno-STAT to selectively activate T-cell receptors for CMV and HIV.
  • Conducted transcriptome analysis of CMV-specific memory T cells after different activation signals.
  • Compared the effects of TCR signaling alone versus combined with co-stimulatory signals (CD28, 4-1BB).
  • IST effectively induced robust recall activation of CMV-specific and HIV-specific memory CD8+ T cells with TCR signaling alone plus IL-2.
  • Combining TCR signaling with co-stimulation significantly altered the transcriptome.
  • Naïve and TCR-engineered CD8+ T cells required additional co-stimulatory signals for strong activation.

Abstract

Abstract To delineate the minimum signals required to activate and expand antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells, we used immunotherapeutics termed Immuno-STAT (IST) that we designed to selectively engage and activate antigen-specific T-cell receptors alone or combined with a defined co-stimulatory signal to recapitulate the discrete activation signals delivered by antigen-presenting cells to human CD8+ T cells. Transcriptome analysis of highly purified CD8+ cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific memory T cells after delivering defined antigen-specific TCR signals alone or with co-stimulatory signals revealed that the combination of TCR signaling and CD28 or 4-1BB co-stimulatory signals significantly altered the transcriptome compared to activation by TCR signaling alone. Nevertheless, IST-delivered CMV-specific or HIV-specific TCR signaling alone in the presence of IL-2 was sufficient to induce robust recall activation and expansion of CMV (NLV)–specific or HIV (SL9)–specific memory CD8+ T cells, respectively. This response contrasts with naïve antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and TCR-engineered T cells, which required CD28 co-stimulation in addition to TCR stimulation for robust antigen-specific activation and expansion. These results have important implications by indicating that immunotherapeutics that deliver antigen-specific TCR signals alone in the presence of adequate environmental cytokine support should be sufficient for immune-based strategies designed to expand antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells to eliminate cancerous or infected cells. In contrast, strategies that aim to optimally stimulate and expand virus or cancer-specific naïve or TCR-engineered T-cell responses would benefit from the codelivery of TCR and CD28 signals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hiner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a67eebf353c071a6f0a85chttps://doi.org/10.1093/jimmun/vkaf329
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Direct single molecule measurement of TCR triggering by agonist pMHC in living primary T cells2013 · 187 citations
  2. 2Low interleukin-2 concentration favors generation of early memory T cells over effector phenotypes during chimeric antigen receptor T-cell expansion2017 · 24 citations
  3. 3Cross-reactive memory T cells associate with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 contacts2022 · 350 citations
  4. 4Cytotoxic T cells are able to efficiently eliminate cancer cells by additive cytotoxicity2021 · 240 citations
  5. 5Entry of Polarized Effector Cells into Quiescence Forces HIV Latency2019 · 69 citations