PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Finite State Machine Guidance Architecture for Autonomous Rendezvous with Arbitrarily Elliptic Targets

View Full Paper
DBDiego BurattiGGGabriella GaiasSTStefano Torresan

Key Points

  • The aim is to design a guidance architecture for safe, autonomous rendezvous using a finite state machine.
  • Developed closed-form impulsive control schemes based on Gauss Variational Equations.
  • Used relative orbital elements for better understanding of relative orbits.
  • Implemented and tested the architecture in a linear propagator and high-fidelity simulator.
  • Validation of maneuver strategies through numerical tests.
  • Demonstrated capability for safe performance across varying target orbit scenarios.
  • Ensured predictability and operational safety in rendezvous operations.

Abstract

This paper details the design of a guidance architecture, in the form of a layered, finite state machine, meant to enable safe and autonomous rendezvous operations. The onboard software uses relative state parametrization based on relative orbital elements which provide significant geometrical insight into the shape of the relative orbit. The development is structured in two main steps: first, novel closed-form impulsive control schemes, derived from the Gauss Variational Equations expressed in a velocity-aligned frame, are formulated. These complement available strategies from the literature and generalize them for arbitrarily eccentric reference orbits. Secondly, the definition of the guidance layer provides the chaser spacecraft with the capability to select, schedule, and execute the proper maneuvers to complete a given rendezvous scenario, ensuring operational safety and predictability. The functionality and performance of the implemented architecture are analyzed through numerical tests in a linear propagator and a high-fidelity non-linear simulator. The results provide validation of the developed maneuvers’ strategies, as well as demonstrating how the proposed guidance architecture can be used in a straightforward fashion across different target orbit scenarios, while guaranteeing the same level of passive safety.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Buratti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a67f12f353c071a6f0aed0https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13030230
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Guidance and Control Architecture for Rendezvous and Approach to a Non-Cooperative Tumbling Target2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Quaternion-Guided Cislunar Guidance via Embedded SIMD MPC2026
  3. 3Modeling, Simulation and Control of a Spacecraft: Automated Rendezvous under Positional Constraints2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Terminal Phase Guidance Law Against Maneuvering Targets: Adaptive State-Dependent Differential Riccati Equation Approach2024
  5. 5Orbit Rendezvous Maneuvers in Cislunar Space via Nonlinear Hybrid Predictive Control2024 · 3 citations