PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Soil Tillage Practises on Soil Properties and Water Infiltration in Maize (Zea mays L.) Monoculture

View Full Paper
FHFrantišek HorejšMCMartin CíslerJHJosef Hula

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate how different soil tillage practices impact soil physical properties and water infiltration in maize monoculture.
  • Conducted a 4-year field study comparing conventional ploughing, shallow tillage, and no tillage.
  • Measured soil bulk density, macroporosity, soil pH, soil organic carbon, and aggregate stability.
  • Assessed water infiltration using double-ring infiltrometers, rainfall simulations, and dye tracer experiments.
  • Shallow tillage showed the highest soil aggregate stability (0.42) compared to conventional ploughing (0.28) and no tillage (0.26).
  • Soil organic carbon content was highest under shallow tillage (3.591%) compared to conventional ploughing (2.838%) and no tillage (2.634%).
  • Water infiltration was significantly higher in ploughing during rainfall simulations, but it also had the highest runoff generation.

Abstract

Soil tillage practices play a key role in controlling soil’s physical properties, water infiltration, and runoff generation, particularly in erosion-prone cropping systems such as maize monocultures. The cultivation of wide-row crops is restricted on erosion-prone land; however, these crops constitute a fundamental basis for livestock feed and represent a key input raw material for biogas plants. This 4-year study evaluated the effects of three tillage practices—conventional ploughing, shallow tillage, and no tillage—on selected soil’s physical and chemical properties and on water infiltration processes in a maize (Zea mays L.) monoculture. Experimental maize stands were established in a field with a silty clay Luvic Chernozem. Field measurements were performed over multiple years and included soil bulk density, macroporosity, cone index, soil organic carbon, soil pH, soil aggregate stability, and water infiltration. Infiltration processes were assessed using a combination of double-ring infiltrometers, rainfall simulation, and dye tracer experiments to characterize water flow patterns under controlled conditions. The results demonstrated that soil tillage significantly influenced the vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and pH, soil aggregate stability, soil compaction, and pore characteristics, with the most pronounced differences observed in the upper soil layers. Soil aggregate stability in the 0–0.10 m layer showed a clear numerical trend, with the highest mean value under ST (0.42) compared with PL (0.28) and no tillage (NT) (0.26). Topsoil Cox was the highest under ST (3.591%) compared with PL (2.838%) and NT (2.634%). Differences among tillage practices were particularly evident during simulated rainfall events, affecting infiltration rates, runoff initiation, and preferential flow patterns. Ring infiltrometer measurements indicated higher infiltration in PL (e.g., 21.1 mm min−1 at minute 1 in PL vs. 11.1/11.9 mm min−1 in ST/NT; 10.9 mm min−1 at minute 10 in PL vs. 5.3/7.6 mm min−1 in ST/NT). However, rainfall simulation showed the highest runoff in PL, including the earliest runoff onset (4.5 min). Despite the soil’s high infiltration capacity due to low bulk density and higher porosity, the decisive factor promoting water infiltration into the soil is the condition of the soil surface, which is influenced by the stability of soil aggregates; this stability was enhanced by the input of organic matter from plant residues. The findings confirm that long-term soil tillage management substantially modifies soil hydraulic behaviour and highlight the importance of tillage system selection for improving soil water infiltration and reducing runoff risk in maize monoculture systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Horejš et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a67f1ff353c071a6f0b160https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050551
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper