Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research demonstrates improved accuracy in velocity picking under multiple interference, suggesting deeper insights into seismic data processing.
Multiples often dominate semblance (velocity) spectra and bias-stacking velocity picks, degrading NMO correction and subsequent imaging. We propose FLD–PA, a practical two-stage workflow for automatic velocity-spectrum picking under strong multiple interference. First, the feature-level decoupling detector (FLD) uses an attention-enhanced, YOLOv4-style architecture to localize sparse key picks while suppressing multiple-related clutter. Second, the physics-informed Point Adjustment (PA) module refines coarse picks by enforcing lateral continuity across adjacent spectra and time consistency constraints derived from the stacked section. This refinement yields a geophysically plausible velocity trend. Experiments on two real datasets from a single offshore survey (with non-overlapping CMP/line subsets) show that FLD–PA improves PA@10px from 91.50% to 93.14% and reduces RMSE from 12.40 to 10.15 pixels compared with a YOLOv8–LSTM baseline. Under a matched-recall setting (≈81%), we tune confidence thresholds on a held-out validation subset and evaluate both methods at the same recall. FLD–PA achieves PA@10px = 93.14% with RMSE = 10.15 pixels, compared with 91.50% and 12.40 pixels for YOLOv8–LSTM. Overall, FLD–PA improves the accuracy and stability of velocity picking under strong multiple interference. However, our evaluation focuses on within-survey robustness; cross-survey generalization remains for future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: