Does a quality improvement initiative involving provider education and EHR tools increase the rates of Lp(a) ordering in an outpatient cardiology clinic?
Patients in a general cardiology fellows' clinic at an urban academic medical center
Quality improvement project interventions focusing on provider education and inclusion of electronic health record-based tools
Baseline ordering practices prior to the intervention
Proportion of patients with an Lp(a) order and proportion of patients with an Lp(a) result
A quality improvement initiative utilizing provider education and EHR tools successfully increased the rate of Lp(a) ordering in an outpatient cardiology clinic.
BACKGROUND Elevated lipoprotein(a) Lp(a) is an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Increasingly, prevention societies recommend testing Lp(a) at least once for all adults. OBJECTIVE A quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed to increase the rates of Lp(a) ordering for patients was piloted in the general cardiology fellows' clinic at an urban academic medical center. METHODS QI project interventions focused on provider education and inclusion of electronic health record-based tools. RESULTS Over a period of 10 months, the proportion of patients with an Lp(a) order increased from 10.1% to 20.9%, and the proportion of patients with an Lp(a) result increased from 7.0% to 11.2%. CONCLUSION Ahead of results from ongoing clinical trials testing Lp(a)-targeted therapies, health systems can use QI methods to assess current Lp(a) ordering practices, identify patients who may benefit from future Lp(a)-targeted therapy, and plan for rapid expansion of Lp(a) testing.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jadry Gruen
Archna Bajaj
Journal of clinical lipidology
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gruen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a759e1c6e9836116a1f43c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2026.01.018
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: