Retrospective study compares ultrasound fetal weight estimates with actual birth weights, indicating strong correlation.
Introduction: Comparison of fetal weight by ultrasound with actual birth weight is significant for clinical management as it is very closely linked with the survival and well-being of a fetus. Sonographic fetal weight estimation is an essential component of antenatal care. Hence, ultrasonography has become a vital tool in modern obstetrics practice. However, the reliability of the result depends a lot on the quality of the machine and the skill of the sonographer. Actual birth weights are measured with a scale corrected for zero error before use. Methods: This is a retrospective study in which clients under regular follow-up were sent from the Gynaecology and Obstetrics department, undergoing routine antenatal ultrasound to assess fetal well-being. Considering ultrasound at term (37-41 weeks), the data were retrieved, and a comparison was made between fetal weight by ultrasound and actual birth weight. Results: Women, 214 in number, who delivered in Patan Academy of Health Sciences were enrolled in this study. The mean estimated fetal weight was 2995.11(± SD 383.42) grams, and the mean of actual birth weight was 3033.15 (± SD 501.47) grams. The correlation coefficient between fetal weight estimated by USG and actual birth weight was 0.907 (p < 0.001), indicating a strong positive linear correlation. Conclusion: Ultrasonography is an essential tool for estimating fetal weight before delivery in term pregnancies, with no significant difference from actual birth weight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dwa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: