PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026The Journal of Physical Chemistry A0 citationsOpen Access

Nickel and Copper in C–H Activation and Carbenoid Chemistry: A Descriptor-Based Comparative Analysis of Transition Metals

View Full Paper
SGSasha Gazzari-JaraOAOlivier ArouleGHGuillaume Hoffmann

Key Points

  • C-H activation mechanisms were rationalized using a descriptor-based framework, enhancing our understanding of reactivity.
  • The PGCDD descriptor was highly predictive, showing strong correlations with activation barriers in metal complexes.
  • Computational analysis among transition metals highlighted the effects of substituents, especially from halogens, on reactivity.
  • Despite higher activation barriers in Ni(II), both metals exhibited similar qualitative trends in C-H activation reactions.

Abstract

A series of Fischer-type carbenoids of groups 10 and 11, bearing diverse electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents, were systematically analyzed using a descriptor-based framework grounded in Conceptual Density Functional Theory (CDFT), assessing whether shared electronic descriptors can rationalize the reaction profiles and reactivity in Ni(II) and Cu(I) complexes in a series of C-H activation reactions. The activation barriers for carbenoid insertion reactions were computed and correlated with reactivity indexes, including the Dual Descriptor and its Grand Canonical extensions based on softness and hardness (SGCDD and PGCDD). Although Ni carbenoids display slightly higher activation barriers than their Cu analogues, both metals exhibit parallel qualitative trends. The PGCDD descriptor showed the strongest predictive capability, yielding high correlations with computed barriers, particularly when refined through excited-state corrections using the Specific State Dual Descriptor (SSDD). Substituent effects especially mesomeric contributions from halogen groups were critically evaluated to establish a coherent electronic interpretation of reactivity. This unified descriptor-based framework provides a transferable methodology for rationalizing C-H activation mechanisms across transition metals, offering valuable insights for the predictive design of metal-carbenoid catalysts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gazzari-Jara et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75a83c6e9836116a2069chttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c07321
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 13d Transition Metals for C–H Activation2018 · 2,324 citations
  2. 2Understanding and exploiting C–H bond activation2002 · 2,761 citations
  3. 3Absolute hardness: companion parameter to absolute electronegativity1983 · 7,887 citations
  4. 4The Activated Complex and the Absolute Rate of Chemical Reactions.1935 · 1,026 citations
  5. 5Treatment of electronic excitations within the adiabatic approximation of time dependent density functional theory1996 · 5,752 citations