PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Does financial center strength drive smart city development? Evidence from global panel data

VNVugar NazarovAzerbaijan State University of EconomicsJHJamal HajiyevAzerbaijan State University of EconomicsCGCavadxan GasimovNakhchivan State University

Key Points

  • Smart city advancement is influenced by financial strength, underscoring its importance at the global level.
  • Random-effects model reveals a significant positive link with 56% of the variation explained in smart city metrics.
  • Observational analysis across 78 cities demonstrates variations in financial center impact based on local contexts.
  • Results highlight leading cities like London and New York while identifying underperformers such as New Delhi and Mumbai.

Abstract

Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractThe accelerating digital and green transition has intensified the role of financial centers as investment conduits, making the relationship between financial strength and smart city development both timely and policy-relevant. This study aims to examine whether and to what extent the Global Financial Centres Index (GFCI) explains variation in the Smart Centres Index (SCI) across a global sample of cities. The analysis relies on panel data covering 78 cities from 2019 to 2025, with all calculations performed in R Studio using fixed effects, random effects, and robust error-corrected estimators. The findings reveal a sharp contrast between specifications: while the fixed-effects model detects no significant relationship (β = 0.0013, p = 0.963), the random-effects model identifies a positive and statistically significant link (β = 0.0858, p lt; 0.001), explaining about 56% of SCI variation (R² = 0.557). Robustness checks with clustered and Driscoll–Kraay standard errors confirm the stability of this result. City-level effects highlight London (+60.24), New York (+54.39), and Singapore (+39.46) as leading overperformers, while New Delhi (–74.49) and Mumbai (–68.15) emerge as underperformers. These outcomes demonstrate that financial strength matters for smart city advancement, but local governance, infrastructure, and innovation ecosystems critically shape whether financial capacity translates into smart development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nazarov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75b0cc6e9836116a21a81https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(1).2026.12
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper