Abstract This paper critiques Peter Singer’s utilitarian defense of abortion, which hinges on the fetus’s lack of preference capacity, through the lens of African (Igbo) jurisprudence and ethics. Singer’s argument, grounded in self-autonomy and individual freedom, is examined for its cross-cultural applicability and ethical robustness. Engaging with this objective, the study employs philosophical analysis and critical hermeneutics. The study finds Singer’s position deficient in universal applicability, particularly lacking resonance with Igbo (African) legal and ethical traditions. Furthermore, his framework is deemed inadequate for informing inclusive public health policies. This work broadens bioethical discourse by incorporating African legal and ethical perspectives, emphasizing the necessity of cultural integration and social harmony in ethical decision-making. Additionally, it contributes to environmental ethics, supporting Singer’s climate change insights while advocating for a more integrative discourse connecting abortion ethics and environmental concerns. The paper underscores the importance of culturally sensitive bioethics for contextually relevant public health policies.
Dimonye et al. (Mon,) studied this question.