PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Cambridge Forum on AI Law and Governance0 citationsOpen Access

Architectures of AI: Tech power broking war?

MHMiah Hammond-Errey

Key Points

  • AI architectures consolidate power among technology companies, impacting national security decisions.
  • The concentration of technological control affects smaller nations' ability to make autonomous choices regarding force.
  • National security decision making is increasingly influenced by tech companies' control over information and infrastructure.
  • As AI and data power grow, traditional notions of state sovereignty face significant challenges.

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the profound impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data on political and military deliberations concerning the decision to wage war. By conceptualising AI as part of a broader, interconnected technology ecosystem – encompassing data, connectivity, energy, compute capacity and workforce – the article introduces the notion of “architectures of AI” to describe the underlying infrastructure shaping contemporary security and sovereignty. It demonstrates how these architectures concentrate power within a select number of technology companies, which increasingly function as national security actors capable of influencing state decisions on the resort to force. The article identifies three critical factors that collectively alter the calculus of war: (i) the concentration of power across the architectures of AI, (ii) the diffusion of national security decision making, and (iii) the role of AI in shaping public opinion. It argues that, as technology companies amass unprecedented control over digital infrastructure and information flows, most nation states – particularly smaller or less technologically advanced ones – experience diminished autonomy in decisions to use force. The article specifically examines how technology companies can coerce, influence or incentivise the resort-to-force decision making of smaller states, thereby challenging traditional notions of state sovereignty and international security.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miah Hammond-Errey (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75b15c6e9836116a21c09https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2025.10028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper