This editorial explores energy commons as viable alternatives in energy transitions, highlighting significant tensions.
This editorial introduces the Collection on “Energy Commons: Collective Action for Sustainable Energy” examining energy commons as alternatives to market-based energy systems. Through three empirical contributions, it explores how energy commoning practices navigate five fundamental paradoxes: inclusion versus exclusion, Western frameworks versus pluriversal approaches, local autonomy versus global coordination, narrow focus versus whole value chains, and anti-capitalist ideals versus market realities. The Collection demonstrates these tensions as productive forces driving innovation in energy governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fouladvand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: