PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026International Journal of General Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Machine Learning-Based Diagnostic Models for Early Gastric Cancer Using Clinical Laboratory Indicators

RJRunbi JiRYRuoyu YangJYJun Yao

Key Points

  • The XGBoost algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.9909, outperforming other models in gastric cancer diagnosis.
  • Key indicators like glutathione reductase and albumin significantly contributed to diagnostic accuracy.
  • Clinical data from gastric cancer patients collected from 2016 to 2023 were utilized in developing the models.
  • The findings support the potential for machine learning to enhance early gastric cancer detection through clinical indicators.

Abstract

Background: The occurrence of gastric cancer is a complex pathological process leading to multiple abnormalities in clinical laboratory indicators. Machine learning techniques can make it easy to handle millions of variables to make more accurate predictions and diagnoses of diseases. Methods: Clinical data from gastric cancer patients in a single-center who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2023 were collected. Five machine learning algorithms (extreme gradient boosting, XGBoost; random forest, RF; support vector machine-recursive feature elimination, SVM-RFE; light gradient boosting machine, LGBM; and recursive partitioning, rpart) were utilized to develop diagnostic models. Among the date, 60% were randomly selected to train the models, while the remaining 40% were used for testing. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), F1-score value, sensitivity, and specificity to evaluate the performance of models. Results: The XGBoost algorithm showed the best performance in gastric cancer diagnosis, with significantly higher area under curve (AUC) (combining blood indicators and pathological parameters, AUC=0.9909) value than other models. Glutathione reductase (GR), carbohydrate antigen 724 (CA724), erythrocytes (RBC), carbohydrate antigen 242 (CA242), and albumin (ALB) contributed the most to the diagnosis. The tumor size were independent risk factors for early gastric cancer. Conclusion: Machine learning combined blood indicators and pathological parameters could predict gastric cancer risk more accurately. The XGBoost model had the best diagnostic performance. The study provides confirmatory data support for the preclinical implementation of the model. Keywords: early gastric cancer, machine learning, diagnostic model, clinical laboratory indicators, glutathione reductase

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ji et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75bdcc6e9836116a23f12https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s559103
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper