PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Delivering Safety Safely: Proportionality and Pragmatism

View Full Paper
HSHelen Summers

Key Points

  • Safe delivery in modern programs requires balancing risk and technology integration, especially for older capabilities.
  • Key metrics highlight the need for equipment contributions to the air system safety case for the Chinook H47 helicopter.
  • Philosophical considerations guide the development of safety systems while emphasizing both proportionality and pragmatism.
  • The focus on appropriate levels of rigor maintains safety standards, indicating a shift in approach based on historical lessons.

Abstract

What is safe? Most programmes nowadays are multinational and sometimes the design is not conducted in accordance with recognised standards. In the modern (post Haddon-Cave) era of Type Certification and regulation, how do we deliver a safe FMS programme for a new, but 60-year-old capability, accommodating new technology and systems without asking everyone to start from scratch? In this lecture, as well as considering the philosophy of safety delivery, I look at how we are developing the equipment contribution to the Air System Safety Case for the new Chinook H47 (Extended Range) helicopter for the RAF to enable our Chief Engineer to understand and transfer risk to the ultimate risk taker. The presentation looks at the drive for proportionality and pragmatism whilst retaining appropriate levels of rigour, and why that matters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Helen Summers (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75c6ec6e9836116a25537https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18404322
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper