PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Sustainability4 citationsOpen Access

Internal vs. External Barriers to Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM): An Empirical Study of Egypt’s Petrochemical Sector

SESara ElzarkaNGNermin GouharIEIslam El-Nakib

Key Points

  • Internal barriers like lack of corporate leadership and resources affect GSCM adoption.
  • External barriers include insufficient government support and a lack of markets for recycled materials.
  • Data were analyzed using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) to uncover hierarchical relationships among barriers.
  • Findings suggest that clear communication and financial incentives may reduce barriers to environmentally responsible GSCM.

Abstract

This study addresses the critical problem of barriers hindering Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) adoption in Egypt’s petrochemical sector, a major economic driver that produces approximately 4.5 million tons annually but generates significant GHG emissions and hazardous waste. The objective is to identify, rank, and analyze the hierarchical relationships among internal and external barriers using a mixed-methods approach. This study focuses on the full petrochemical supply chain in Egypt, encompassing upstream (raw material sourcing), midstream (manufacturing/refining processes), and downstream (distribution, waste management, reverse logistics), with an emphasis on emission/waste reduction practices. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire from 400 employees in Egyptian petrochemical firms and analyzed using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM). The findings showed that internal impediments, such as a lack of corporate leadership and support (IB1), a critical shortage of resources (IB6), and the absence of green initiatives (IB5), serve as driving forces that exert a cascading influence over the external barriers, which include insufficient government support (EB1), a lack of markets for recycled materials (EB5), and human resources or expertise shortages (EB7). The study contributes to the existing literature on GSCM by incorporating international trends and specifically addressing Egyptian issues, including weak policies, difficult supply chains, high energy-intensive operations, and costly operations. The study suggests that sending clear messages from the top and providing financial incentives can help push the obstacles aside and guide the industry down the path of environmentally responsible operations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elzarka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75ca8c6e9836116a25b5ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18031330
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Key elements of green supply chain management drivers and barriers empirical study of solar energy companies in South Egypt2021 · 24 citations
  2. 2The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Green Innovation Resilience: Evidence from China2025 · 5 citations
  3. 3Divergent Paths to Sustainability: A Comparative Evaluation of Multidimensional Value and Spatial Evolution in China’s State-Owned and Non-State-Owned Enterprises2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4The impact of blockchain on carbon reduction in remanufacturing supply chains within the carbon trading market: A chaos and bifurcation analysis2025 · 13 citations
  5. 5Sustainability Transformation Through Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Green Innovations in Pakistan’s Manufacturing and Service Industries2025 · 29 citations