PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative performance of GPT-4, GPT-o3, GPT-5, Gemini-3-Flash, and DeepSeek-R1 in ophthalmology question answering

PZPing ZhangJWJiaoman WangXHXinya Hu

Key Points

  • Ophthalmology question answering reveals superior performance from GPT-o3 and Gemini-3-Flash in clinical decision support.
  • Notably, GPT-5 did not exceed its predecessor's accuracy or stability for medical questions.
  • Assessment using large language models demonstrates prompt engineering's limited effect on closed-ended queries.
  • Future research should focus on multimodal integration and validation in actual healthcare settings.

Abstract

GPT-o3 and Gemini-3-Flash achieve superior stability and accuracy in ophthalmology Question Answering (QA), making them suitable for high-stakes clinical decision support. The open-source model DeepSeek-R1 shows competitive potential, especially in complex tasks. Notably, GPT-5 failed to surpass its predecessor in both accuracy and consistency in this specialized domain. Prompt engineering has a limited impact on performance for closed-ended medical questions. Future work should extend to multimodal integration and real-world clinical validation to enhance the practical utility and reliability of LLMs in medicine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75cdec6e9836116a261achttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2026.1744389
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper