Open versus laparoscopic ablation of liver malignancies – a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Lucas Alexander Knøfler; Jeanett Klubien; Peter Nørgaard Larsen; Kristian Schaumburg Kiim; Daisuke Fukumori; Christoph Tschuor; Susanne Dam Nielsen; Jacob Rosenberg

doi:10.61409/a04250305

January 1, 2026Danish Medical JournalOpen Access

Open versus laparoscopic ablation of liver malignancies – a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Laparoscopic ablation is expected to improve recovery times compared to open procedures, leading to better patient outcomes.
The primary endpoint is the difference in recovery times over a specified follow-up period after treatment.
Randomised controlled trial protocol compares outcomes between two surgical techniques for liver malignancies.
If successful, this trial may reshape surgical approaches for treating liver cancer in clinical settings.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Randomised clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of laparoscopic ablation for liver malignancies, suggesting a potential improvement in patient outcomes.

Abstract

Nct06304766.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Knøfler et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75e0bc6e9836116a2866f https://doi.org/10.61409/a04250305

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Open versus laparoscopic ablation of liver malignancies – a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Key Points

No abstract yet

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Open versus laparoscopic ablation of liver malignancies – a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Key Points

No abstract yet

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading