⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

January 1, 2026Medical Journal Armed Forces India

Piezosurgery vs conventional sequential osteotomy for implant site preparation: An umbrella review of their effects on implant stability and marginal bone loss

K.S.V. Ramesh P.A. Vijay kumar P.A. Vijay kumar PS Gautami N.V.S.G. Sruthima P. Mohan Kumar P. Mohan Kumar K. Anil Kumar M. Venkata Lakshmi

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Piezosurgery enhances implant stability compared to conventional sequential osteotomy, indicating potential benefits.
Findings show less marginal bone loss associated with piezosurgery, providing a significant advantage in dental procedures.
Observational analysis assessed multiple studies, highlighting varied results in their comparison of techniques.
Results may enable improved decision-making for dental professionals considering implant preparation techniques.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Implication

Umbrella review compares implant stability and bone loss between two osteotomy techniques, suggesting important implications for dental procedures.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Ramesh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75e47c6e9836116a28b83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2025.12.016

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Changes in Implant Stability Using Different Site Preparation Techniques: Twist Drills versus Piezosurgery. A Single‐Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical TrialCohort Study · 2011 · 96 citations
2Piezoelectric vs. conventional drilling in implant site preparation: pilot controlled randomized clinical trial with crossover designCohort Study · 2013 · 55 citations
3Comparison of heat production and bone architecture changes in the implant site preparation with compressive osteotomes, osseodensification technique, piezoelectric devices, and standard drills: an ex vivo study on porcine ribsOriginal Research · 2022 · 36 citations
4Standard Drilling Versus Ultrasonic Implant Site PreparationOriginal Research · 2017 · 15 citations
5Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: Osseodensification drills versus piezoelectric surgery. A multi‐center prospective randomized controlled clinical trialCohort Study · 2022 · 49 citations

More related papers

Piezoelectric versus conventional implant site preparation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis2017
Evaluation of implant site preparation with piezosurgery versus conventional drills in terms of operation time, implant stability and bone density (randomized controlled clinical trial- split mouth design)2022
Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation Using Piezosurgery: A Multicenter Case Series Study Analyzing 3,579 Implants with a 1- to 3-Year Follow-Up2014

More from Medical Journal Armed Forces India

Suicidal left ventricle following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A case reportSat,
Electrocardiographic findings in Indian athletes and retrospective applicability to 2017 International criteria for ECG interpretation in athletes: A systematic reviewSat,