Key result
Novel echo-based formula correlates moderately with actual implanted annuloplasty ring size.
Why the study?
Does a mathematical formula based on pre-operative echocardiography accurately predict the optimal ring size in patients undergoing mitral valve repair?
Cohort (n=54)
No
Does a mathematical formula based on pre-operative echocardiography accurately predict the optimal ring size in patients undergoing mitral valve repair?
A novel mathematical formula based on pre-operative echocardiography can reliably predict optimal ring size for mitral valve repair, particularly when using semirigid rings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide preoperative planning in mitral repair; leaves open prospective validation before adoption.
Background: During mitral valve repair (MVRe), the sizing of the prosthetic ring/band often depends more on the surgeon's experience than objective methodology. The study aims to validate a mathematical approach based on transthoracic echocardiography to predict the optimal ring size in a surgical cohort. Methods: Patients who underwent MVRe between July 2021 and July 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Pre-operative echocardiography data were collected [including pre-operative coaptation length (CL0), anteroposterior (AP) diameter, anterior mitral leaflet (AML) length, posterior mitral leaflet (PML) length]. A dedicated formula was developed to predict the postoperative AP (pAP) diameter, ensuring a CL of 8 mm, according to the literature. Based on the calculated pAP, the optimal ring size was selected using the manufacturer's ring charts. A linear regression study tested the consistency between the predicted and implanted sizes. Results: Fifty-four patients were included; six implanted a Flexible Band, 17 a Semirigid Band, and 31 a Semirigid Ring. In linear regression, there was an acceptable correlation between predicted/implanted sizes (r=0.589; P<0.001). Overall, the only factor influencing concordance was ring type. When analyzing the single ring groups, we found that correlation was impacted by ring type with an optimal correlation for Semirigid Rings (r=0.745, P<0.001), good for Semirigid Bands (r=0.659, P=0.004), and poor for Flexible Bands. Conclusions: The proposed method is reliable in predicting the optimal ring size, with a CL >8 mm; however, the test's ability is influenced by the type of ring. Further studies are needed to validate the formula in a larger population and investigate its use in transcatheter annuloplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Besola et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Degenerative mitral regurgitation (n=54). Echocardiography-based mathematical formula for ring sizing vs. Actual implanted ring size was evaluated on Correlation between predicted and implanted ring sizes (r=0.589, p=<0.001). A novel echocardiography-based mathematical formula demonstrated an acceptable correlation (r=0.589, P<0.001) in predicting the optimal annuloplasty ring size compared to the actually implanted size.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: