PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems2 citationsOpen Access

Barlow Twins for semi-supervised learning in NIR spectroscopy

View Full Paper
MWMark WohlersAMAndrew McGloneEFEibe Frank

Key Points

  • Performance improvements with Barlow Twins were noted, achieving up to 17% lower root mean square error (RMSE).
  • The approach incorporated unlabelled spectra, enhancing learning from limited labelled data with semi-supervised techniques.
  • Using multiple device measurements as different 'views' showed significant benefits in calibration transfer tasks.
  • Barlow Twins loss maintained efficacy even with larger training set sizes, proving its robustness.

Abstract

Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is a widely used technology in the horticulture industry for non-destructive fruit grading. Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression is the dominant method for producing fruit quality predictions from measured spectra. Alternative deep learning methods have shown promise, but often require large amounts of labelled data to train. This study proposes a semi-supervised method based on Barlow Twins to include unlabelled data in the training process. We adopt the Barlow Twins method by using repeated measurements on the same fruit from different devices as different “views” to encode into the same latent space and combine the encoder network with a regression head for prediction. Our approach demonstrates improved performance over PLS with up to 17% lower RMSE, especially when the labelled data is limited. The Barlow loss function also improves calibration transfer results. • Novel application of Barlow Twins contrastive learning to NIR spectroscopy using repeated measurements from different devices. • Semi-supervised learning allows for unlabelled spectra to assist in training. • Up to 50% reduction in RMSE in calibration transfer tasks compared to training on the MSE loss only. • The best performance gains were observed at small labelled training sizes. • The Barlow Twins loss was not detrimental at large training set sizes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wohlers et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76108c6e9836116a2e907https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2026.105664
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper