PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Geodesy and Geodynamics0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of the impact of the biomass on GRACE-borne total water storage estimates in the Amazon Basin

View Full Paper
LFLóránt FöldváryBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsMAMalika AminjanovaSamarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov

Key Points

  • Total water storage trends reveal a significant influence from biomass variations, with a contribution of 10%–20% to observed mass anomalies.
  • Linear trends show biomass changes at −0.0016 cm/year, contrasting with GRACE data at −0.0165 cm/year and CSR at −0.0081 cm/year.
  • Investigation integrated across the Amazon Basin highlights the discrepancy between localized biomass changes and large-scale hydrological processes.
  • Findings suggest that GRACE estimates may overestimate actual variations in total water storage due to biomass influences.

Abstract

The Amazon Basin plays a central role in regulating global carbon and water cycles, yet the interaction between forest biomass changes and terrestrial water storage (TWS) remains insufficiently constrained. Monthly GRACE and GRACE-FO surface mass anomalies were determined (2002–2025, using monthly solutions provided by JPL and CSR), and they were compared to aboveground biomass (AGB) variations in order to quantify the contribution of biomass to long-term basin-scale TWS trends. Spatial patterns reveal that TWS anomalies are governed primarily by large-scale hydrological processes, while biomass changes are more localized. Regardless of the differences in spatial distribution, biomass exerts a basin-wide influence via evapotranspiration and water balance feedbacks; thus, the investigation is performed integrally for the entire basin. Linear trends of the spatially integrated time series were calculated, resulting in −0.0016 cm/year for the biomass variations, −0.0165 cm/year for the JPL, and −0.0081 cm/year for the CSR TWS time series. The results indicate that TWS time series contain signals from biomass variation, accounting for approximately 10%–20% of the observed surface mass anomaly. Thus the GRACE-borne TWS variation might overestimate the real water mass variations to this extent.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Földváry et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7614ac6e9836116a2f147https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2025.12.005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper