PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Methods in Psychology3 citationsOpen Access

Writing-With: A manifesto for reflective entanglement

View Full Paper
TPTrut Thuy PhamTLThanh Thao Le

Key Points

  • Writing-With emphasizes a recursive relation between analysis and writing, encouraging deeper engagement with texts.
  • The manifesto identifies four refusals that challenge conventional scholarly processes, such as the demand for speed and seamless mastery.
  • Grounded in collaborative work, the approach seeks relational accountability in how we read and cite sources.
  • It encourages cultivating offerings like depth without distance and co-thinking, promoting a more engaged scholarly practice.

Abstract

Why read this, and what do you get? This manifesto names Writing-With as a stance for scholarly writing that treats analysis and writing as co-moving, less a sequence than a recursive relation. We argue that staying with texts through returns can slow the rush to finality, soften mastery, and cultivate relational accountability in how we read, cite, and craft claims. Grounded in our collaborative work with university teachers in Vietnamese higher education, we offer four refusals (of speed, separation, fixity, and seamless mastery) and four offerings (depth without distance, co-thinking, saturation-as-opening, and writing-as-relation).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pham et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7655dbadf0bb9e87d8d7fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2026.100233
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper