PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Ultramicroscopy2 citationsOpen Access

Temperature distributions in MEMS microheaters during gas phase experiments in an environmental TEM

View Full Paper
AKAmit KumarZMZhongtao MaJTJulian Taubmann

Key Points

  • Temperature profiles in MEMS microheaters vary based on gas phase conditions, highlighting key differences.
  • In 3 mbar of H2, a temperature difference of 60 °C is observed compared to 13 °C in vacuum environments.
  • A computational fluid dynamics model aligns well with experimental results, verifying the temperature measurements.
  • These findings underscore the importance of accurate temperature measurements in designing ETEM experiments.

Abstract

Reliable sample temperature measurements are essential in environmental transmission electron microscope (ETEM) experiments. In this study, the effect of flowing gases on the temperature distribution at a MEMS microheater in gas phase is investigated. A computational fluid dynamics model is developed and compared with experimental data. The modeling results agree well with experimental measurements based on the melting temperature of Zn nanoparticles, confirming the model's reliability. The results show that the temperature profile across the heating chip in the case with H2 environment is less uniform compared to the case of vacuum and O2. For example, at a set temperature of 900 °C in 3 mbar H2, a temperature difference of 60 °C is observed between the central sample position compared to the surrounding arc-shaped heater which also is the temperature sensor, while the difference in the vacuum case is only 13 °C. Temperature is one of the key parameters in in-situ TEM experiments and, therefore, these findings are important in the design of ETEM experiments, especially when using MEMS microheaters with relatively large distances between TEM sample and microheater/sensor.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a765a0badf0bb9e87d9cb4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2026.114326
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper