The expanding role of government-provided freebies in Indian electoral politics has triggered considerable public discourse, frequently examined through normative or fiscal lenses. However, remarkably little scholarly attention has been directed toward understanding how voters themselves comprehend and assess such welfare benefits. This research adopts a qualitative approach to investigate voter narratives surrounding freebies in Delhi, drawing on semi-structured, in-depth interviews with voters representing diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The study explores how citizens interpret freebies in relation to their everyday lived experiences, conceptions of state responsibility, and electoral decision-making processes. The findings challenge conventional assumptions about voter behavior. Rather than perceiving freebies merely as electoral inducements, participants understood them as everyday support mechanisms, legitimate entitlements of citizenship, and subjects of household-level deliberation. While freebies prominently feature in electoral discussions, they rarely function as decisive determinants of voting behavior. Simultaneously, policy-oriented dissent among voters highlights genuine concerns regarding long-term development priorities and capacity building. By foregrounding voter voices, this paper contributes to a more nuanced understanding of welfare politics and democratic participation in contemporary urban India.
Suman et al. (2026) studied this question.