PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health2 citationsOpen Access

Lived realities of family engagement: A thematic exploration of the family adoption program

RARashmi S. AmoghashreeKSK. ShruddhaANAnchu R Nath

Key Points

  • Families view the Family Adoption Program positively when student visits are regular and effective in addressing health needs.
  • Twenty families in rural Karnataka shared their experiences, leading to the identification of seven key themes.
  • Thematic analysis highlighted barriers like language disconnect and scheduling issues affecting program engagement.
  • Continuous feedback mechanisms are essential to enhance the program's impact on both families and students.

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground The Family Adoption Program (FAP) was introduced to strengthen community engagement and foster experiential learning in Indian medical education. While most evaluations focus on student perspectives, the lived experiences of families remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore the perceptions, experiences, and suggestions of families participating in the FAP in rural Karnataka. Methodology A qualitative study was conducted in June 2025 in the villages of Hanchya and Rammanahalli, Karnataka, using a phenomenological approach. Purposive sampling method was used to identify the families who had participated in the program for at least three years. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted in Kannada, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed to identify key patterns across narratives. Results Twenty families participated in this study. Seven themes emerged: (1) navigating language and communication, (2) disruption versus engagement in daily life, (3) scope and nature of student interventions, (4) perceived gaps in continuity of care, (5) engagement with health camps, (6) relationship dynamics with student visitors, and (7) community suggestions for program enhancement. Families valued students' ability to communicate in the local language, provide health education, and offer basic clinical checks, which raised trust and better rapport. However, barriers such as linguistic disconnect, inconvenient scheduling, limited follow-up, and predominantly survey-based interactions diminished program effectiveness. Conclusion Families perceive FAP as beneficial when visits are regular, with lesser language barrier, and service-oriented. Continuous and regular visits with adaptable schedules to family needs, and including organized feedback mechanisms can improve both community impact and student learning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Amoghashree et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a767f7badf0bb9e87e3143https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2026.102305
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper