PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026ACS Omega3 citationsOpen Access

Predicting Carbon Dot Photoluminescence: A Comparative Machine Learning Study on Systematic Synthesis Data

View Full Paper
ADAli Nabi DumanYDYoucef DjoudiSPSkyler Phillips

Key Points

  • CatBoost achieves a predictive accuracy with a mean cross-validation coefficient of determination of approximately 0.98, surpassing other models.
  • A systematic experimental dataset, involving 407 carbon dot syntheses, served as the foundation for the machine learning analysis.
  • Comparative analysis focused on state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms, including Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost.
  • Findings support using gradient boosting algorithms for efficient on-demand synthesis of functional nanomaterials.

Abstract

The design of carbon dots (CDs) with tailored optical properties is a significant challenge in materials science, often hindered by complex synthetic protocols and nonlinear synthesis-property relationships. To accelerate this process, we present a data-driven approach leveraging machine learning to predict the photoluminescent emission of CDs from their synthesis parameters. A systematic experimental data set was utilized, comprising 407 CD syntheses prepared from p-benzoquinone and ethylenediamine across different solvents. We performed a rigorous comparative analysis of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms: Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost. The results demonstrate that CatBoost provides superior predictive accuracy, achieving a mean cross-validation coefficient of determination (R 2) of approximately 0.98, outperforming other models. These findings highlight the efficacy of gradient boosting algorithms, particularly CatBoost, in modeling systematic chemical data and provide a validated computational tool to guide the efficient, on-demand synthesis of functional nanomaterials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76875badf0bb9e87e4b46https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c13154
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper