PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering4 citationsOpen Access

An IIVY-AdaBoost prediction model for rockburst intensity: Integrating multi-strategy optimization with SHAP-driven insight

View Full Paper
KPKang PengHHHaoyu HeKLKechao Li

Key Points

  • The IIVY-AdaBoost model achieves a prediction accuracy of 90.17%, significantly enhancing rockburst forecasting.
  • Key predictors identified by SHAP analysis include the strain energy storage index and maximum tangential stress.
  • The framework addresses data imbalance through synthetic minority oversampling, improving model reliability.
  • Validation using field data from multiple mines confirms the practical utility of the prediction model.

Abstract

Rockburst prediction is vital for ensuring safe underground construction. Machine learning (ML) has advanced rockburst prediction, yet imbalanced datasets, particularly for specific intensities, often causes biased models or overfitting. This study introduces a novel ML framework for rockburst intensity prediction, utilizing six key indices: the maximum tangential stress ( σ θ ), uniaxial compressive strength ( R c ), uniaxial tensile strength ( R t ), stress concentration factor (SCF), brittleness index (BI), and strain energy storage index ( W et ). A global dataset of 570 rockburst cases was compiled, with the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) applied to address class imbalance, improving the representation of underrepresented grades. An improved IVY algorithm (IIVY) optimizes hyperparameter tuning. It integrates into an IIVY-AdaBoost model that combines decision trees (DT) and support vector machines (SVM) as base learners. The model achieves superior performance, with accuracy of 90.17%, precision of 0.89, recall of 0.90, and F1-score of 0.90. Compared with the base learners (DT, IVY-DT, IIVY-DT, SVM, IVY-SVM, IIVY-SVM, AdaBoost, IVY-AdaBoost, PSO (PARTICLE SWARM Optimization)-AdaBoost, GWO (Grey Wolf Optimizer)-AdaBoost), the IIVY-AdaBoost demonstrates an enhanced accuracy and robustness. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis highlights W et and σ θ as the key predictors. Validation using field data from Jinping II Hydropower Station, Sanshandao Gold Mine, and Xincheng Gold Mine confirms the model’s robust engineering applicability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a768a4badf0bb9e87e56cchttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2026.01.015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper