PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026The Astrophysical Journal2 citationsOpen Access

Long-term Timing Evolution of Four Anomalous X-Ray Pulsars

View Full Paper

Key Points

  • The long-term study reveals a total of 10 timing events among four anomalous X-ray pulsars.
  • Notably, 4U 0142+61 exhibits two antiglitches, highlighting its unique timing behavior among AXPs.
  • Monitoring from 2017 to 2024, analysis focused on pulse profile evolution and timing anomalies in AXPs.
  • Findings support the theory that pulse profile evolution is a common characteristic of magnetars.

Abstract

Abstract Anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) and soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) are believed to be manifestations of magnetars. Typically, AXPs exhibit higher X-ray luminosities, whereas SGRs are generally fainter and display significantly high signal-to-noise ratios only during their outburst phases. In this work, we report the long-term timing evolution of four AXPs: 1E 2259+586, 4U 0142+61, 1RXS J170849.0–400910, and 1E 1841-045, which were regularly monitored with Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer from 2017 to 2024. Over this period, we identify a total of 10 timing events. In addition to one glitch and one antiglitch in 1E 2259+586 reported in the literature, we detect another eight new timing events: five glitches, two antiglitches, and one unusual state transition event. Notably, both antiglitches were observed in 4U 0142+61, making it the most frequent source of such events, and there is a hint of regular evolution in its pulse profile. In the case of 1RXS J170849.0–400910, it continues to exhibit pronounced high-frequency timing anomalies and undergoes a state transition event. Finally, we study the evolution of the pulse profiles and find that the profiles of 1E 2259+586 and 4U 0142+61 both evolve. This is consistent with the earlier finding that pulse profile evolution is a generic feature of magnetars.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2026 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a768bbbadf0bb9e87e5c22https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae4007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The UHURU catalog of X-ray souces.1972 · 285 citations
  2. 2ixpeobssim: A simulation and analysis framework for the imaging X-ray polarimetry explorer2022 · 216 citations
  3. 3A Radiatively Quiet Glitch and Anti-glitch in the Magnetar 1E 2259+5862020 · 28 citations
  4. 4IXPE Detection of Highly Polarized X-Rays from the Magnetar 1E 1841-0452025 · 18 citations
  5. 5Magnetars: A Short Review and Some Sparse Considerations2020 · 70 citations