PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Conservation2 citationsOpen Access

An Overview of the Illegal Wildlife Trade Activities in South Africa

View Full Paper
NSNdivhuwo ShivambuNSNimmi Seoraj-PillaiTNTshifhiwa Constance Nangammbi

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze illegal wildlife trade activities and their impact on biodiversity in South Africa.
  • Analyzed TRAFFIC wildlife crime records from 1984 to 2025
  • Identified hotspots and trends in enforcement
  • Examined species affected by illegal wildlife trade
  • Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal reported highest species diversity affected
  • Western Cape recorded the most incidents, primarily seizures
  • Seizures positively correlated with arrests (Pearson’s r = 0.90, p = 0.001)
  • 50 species across nine animal classes impacted, including rhinos and pangolins
  • Need for targeted law enforcement interventions highlighted

Abstract

The illegal wildlife trade remains a significant threat to biodiversity in South Africa. The poaching of native species in the country has increased over the years, primarily driven by the demand for abalone, rhino horns, and pangolin scales. This study analysed TRAFFIC wildlife crime records between 1984 and 2025 to identify hotspots, trends in enforcement over time, and the most affected species. We found that provinces such as Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal have the highest diversity of species affected, while the Western Cape recorded the highest number of incidents, predominantly seizures. Seizure was the most common wildlife activity, followed by poaching and illegal harvesting, with fewer cases of smuggling, breeding, and prosecution. A total of 50 species across nine animal classes were impacted, with white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum (Burchell, 1817)), abalone (Haliotis midae (Linnaeus, 1758)), lion (Panthera leo (Linnaeus, 1758)), and ground pangolin (Smutsia temminckii (Smuts, 1832)) among the most frequently targeted. Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship between seizures and arrests (Pearson’s r = 0.90, p = 0.001) across provinces. This indicates a substantial strengthening of law-enforcement activity across provinces, likely driven by enhanced detection or reporting, as reflected in a rising proportion of cases resulting in arrests. Species such as elephants and pangolins were associated with enforcement outcomes, particularly those involving horns, tusks, scales, and dead specimens. There is a need for targeted interventions in high-risk areas, and provinces must collaborate in combating the wildlife trade. Limitations in data completeness and species representation suggest the need for improved surveillance and reporting mechanisms to fully understand and combat illegal wildlife trade in South Africa.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shivambu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cc9fd48f933b5eed848ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/conservation6010027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper