Mixed methods inquiry examines public history initiatives' impact on collective memory in South Africa, suggesting policy improvements for inclusivity.
Public history initiatives have emerged as significant tools for fostering reconciliation and collective memory in post-conflict societies around the world. In South Africa, these efforts are particularly noteworthy given its legacy of apartheid and subsequent democratic transition. This mixed methods inquiry employs both qualitative interviews with stakeholders involved in public history projects (n=30) and quantitative surveys among local communities (n=1200) to examine perceptions and experiences related to these initiatives. Data analysis will utilise thematic coding for interview transcripts and inferential statistics for survey responses. Community engagement through public history projects has led to increased recognition of apartheid's impact, with over 85% of respondents agreeing that such initiatives have enhanced their understanding of the past. However, disparities in project accessibility persist, particularly among marginalized groups. Public history plays a crucial role in facilitating collective memory-making in post-conflict societies by providing platforms for dialogue and education. Future efforts should prioritise inclusivity to ensure broader societal impact. Policy makers should allocate resources towards expanding public history projects into underrepresented areas, enhancing accessibility, and fostering community involvement. Educational institutions are encouraged to integrate these programmes into curricula as part of a comprehensive approach to historical education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mshengu et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: