Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This retrospective study assesses the outcomes of eye probing in children with eye obstruction, indicating significant effectiveness in specific age groups.
Background and objectives: Pediatric eye probing is a common treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction which affect many infants who might be asymptomatic, careful monitoring should be done. The aim of this study was to determine which pediatric age group benefits most from eye probing in Duhok, Kurdistan region. This study provides insights into the demographics and outcomes of pediatric eye probing, guiding individualized treatment. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed records of 192 children, aged 1 to 30 months, diagnosed with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction at Duhok Eye Hospital between January 1, 2023, and September 1, 2023. Data collected included age, gender, operated eye, and residency. The study observed the outcomes of eye probing. Results: Majority of children who underwent probing were aged 7-12 months (34.9%), with an even distribution across age groups. Male accounted for 49.5% of cases. Most patients were from Duhok city (66.7%). Surgery was performed on the right eye in 26.0% of cases, the left eye in 33.3%, and both eyes in 40.6%. Procedure was successful in 91.1% of patients, with 90.6% requiring only one operation. The study shows no statistical benefit for the second time operation regarding age and gender, p value = 0.17, and 0.38, respectively. Conclusion: Eye probing is highly effective for children aged 7-12 months. The observed gender differences in outcomes warrants further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussein et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: