PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Discover Education1 citationsOpen Access

Education for sustainability and artificial intelligence based on computational thinking: a nature care play for early childhood

JAJhon AléMRMariana Rodríguez-Donoso

Key Points

  • The study aims to create educational activities that teach early childhood students about AI through a focus on environmental care.
  • Designed a sequence of learning activities for early childhood education.
  • Utilized a four-stage design-based research approach.
  • Conducted evaluations with experts using surveys and open feedback.
  • Implemented activities with children aged 6–8 and recorded sessions for analysis.
  • Applied descriptive, statistical, and content analyses on the data collected.
  • Experts positively validated the educational content and format of the activities.
  • Identified challenges in children's understanding of AI concepts.
  • Implementation revealed strong interest among children in environmental issues and computational thinking activities.

Abstract

In line with the principles of peace, justice, and sustainability, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its subfields, such as Machine Learning, have the potential to make learning more equitable, accessible, and inclusive. To achieve this, it is important to promote educational experiences from early ages that help children understand how AI works, using low-cost, easily accessible resources that are contextualized to real-world problems. This study seeks to contribute to that goal in an underexplored age group by presenting the design of a sequence of learning activities for early childhood education. The sequence combines strategies based on Computational Thinking (CT) and play, focusing on the care of endangered fish species in Chile. Methodologically, a four-stage design-based research approach was followed, including two rounds of evaluation and redesign: first, five experts assessed the content and format of the proposed activities through a closed-question survey and provided open-ended feedback on their choices; then, a second evaluation was carried out in which the activities were implemented with 15 children aged 6–8, and the sessions were recorded and photographed. Descriptive, statistical, and content analyses were conducted on the collected data. Overall, the results indicate that the experts positively validated the educational resources in terms of format and content, while also identifying difficulties related to children’s understanding of AI. Across the board, the implementation with children revealed a strong interest in the environmental issue and in its combination with CT-based activities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alé et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7ccc3d48f933b5eed897bhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01131-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper