TPS894 Background: UC is the 2nd most common genitourinary cancer. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab became a SOC in 2023 in frontline mUC setting. There is no established standard of care for the subsequent lines of therapy limiting treatment options to platinum-based chemotherapy, docetaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine. Erdafitinib remains an option for pts with FGFR3 alterations. A phase I/II CTEP study of eribulin (E) for mUC established the activity of E with an objective response rate (ORR) of 37.5%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.1 months (mo), and median overall survival (OS) of 9.5 mo (N = 150). A phase II CTEP study of gemcitabine-eribulin (GE) in cisplatin ineligible mUC showed an ORR of 50%, median OS of 11.9 mo, and median PFS of 5.3 mo (N = 24). The most common Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (63%), anemia and fatigue (29% each). Pts with liver metastases benefited from therapy with an ORR of 71% (n = 7) for GE vs. 24% for E (N = 49). Methods: This is an updated phase III, randomized trial comparing GE vs. SOC (docetaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine monotherapy). E is given at 1.4mg/m2 on day (D) 1 and 8 of a 21 D cycle. Gemcitabine is added to E at 1000 mg/m2 on D 1 and D 8. SOC follows approved dosing. There is no limit to the number/sequence of prior regimens. Pts with bone only metastases are eligible. All pts must have: received systemic therapy with EV; received PD1/PDL1 Ab or been deemed ineligible for PD1/PDL1 Ab. The study seeks to find at least a 50% increase in the primary endpoint of OS (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.667). Secondary endpoints include ORR and PFS. This design has a power of 80% and a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect a HR = 0.667. We require 184 pts (92 in each arm) to yield a total of 168 eligible pts. Funding: National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819. Eribulin is provided by Eisai. Clinical trial information: NCT04579224 .
Sadeghi et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: