PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 20260 citations

From Reproduction to Licensing: Applying Article 15 CDSMD to the Process of Generative AI Training

View Full Paper
KSKlara Schinzler

Key Points

  • To explore the legal implications of using press content for training generative AI systems and its relationship to copyright.
  • Analysis of Article 15 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD)
  • Examination of the use of press publications for AI training
  • Development of a test for assessing reproduction rights in this context
  • Identifies potential copyright infringements in AI training using press content
  • Distinguishes between protected editorial content and mere facts
  • Proposes collective licensing as a means to provide legal clarity and fair compensation

Abstract

As Generative AI becomes central to the digital landscape, its reliance on vast datasets – often sourced from publicly available press publications – raises pressing legal questions concerning intellectual property (IP) rights. This article examines whether the use of such content for training AI systems may infringe Article 15 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD), a provision originally intended to regulate unlicensed uses by news aggregators and search engines. It explores the legal implications of using press content at scale for training purposes – typically without attribution, remuneration, or a clear legal basis – and identifies the specific stages of the training process where reproduction rights may be implicated. A central issue is the scope of the press publishers’ right (PPR), particularly the distinction between protected editorial content and unprotected “mere facts”. To support this analysis, the article develops a test for assessing whether a given use constitutes infringing reproduction under Article 15 CDSMD. It further argues that, where training uses qualify as infringing, collective licensing could offer a pragmatic solution – ensuring legal certainty for developers, fair compensation for publishers, and fostering a sustainable and pluralistic digital information ecosystem.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Klara Schinzler (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7ccd5d48f933b5eed8acfhttps://doi.org/10.53292/c31b2d64.c30366a4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper