Survey identifies no archaeological anomalies in Site 178, suggesting limited historical significance.
The survey has not identified any anomalies of definite or possible archaeological origin. The only distinguishable anomaly present in the data is an area of magnetic disturbance which corresponds to a bowl-shaped depression in the field and a LiDAR feature which may identify a former extraction pit not recorded on historic mapping. No magnetic anomalies have been recorded which may relate to other LiDAR/remote sensing features of possible former banks/ditches, extraction pits or ponds. There is also no evidence of any anomalies which might relate to an early medieval settlement possibly located south of Yarlet School c.375m to the north-west. The survey has not identified any anomalies of definite or possible archaeological origin. The only distinguishable anomaly present in the data is an area of magnetic disturbance which corresponds to a bowl-shaped depression in the field and a LiDAR feature which may identify a former extraction pit not recorded on historic mapping. No magnetic anomalies have been recorded which may relate to other LiDAR/remote sensing features of possible former banks/ditches, extraction pits or ponds. There is also no evidence of any anomalies which might relate to an early medieval settlement possibly located south of Yarlet School c.375m to the north-west.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matt Berry (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: