PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Behavior Research Methods0 citationsOpen Access

Multiple imputation of multilevel data with single-level models: A fully conditional specification approach using adjusted group means

SGSimon GrundOLOliver LüdtkeARAlexander Robitzsch

Key Points

  • To introduce a fully conditional specification approach for multiple imputation of multilevel data using adjusted and group means.
  • Develop a fully conditional specification approach for multiple imputation.
  • Combine single-level methods with group means and adjusted group means.
  • Conduct theoretical investigations and multiple simulation studies to assess performance.
  • The adjusted group means approach outperforms conventional multilevel MI methods in various scenarios.
  • The group means approach shows less stable performance across the tested designs.
  • Methods effectively handle both balanced and unbalanced designs with multiple variables.

Abstract

Abstract Missing data are a common challenge in multilevel designs, and multiple imputation (MI) is often used for handling them. Past research has shown that multilevel MI provides an effective treatment of missing data, so long as the imputation model takes the multilevel structure and the intended analyses into account, and modern methods have been developed that can accommodate even complex types of analyses. However, multilevel MI can be difficult to apply in practice, where the multilevel structure is often not very pronounced or not of immediate interest in the analysis. In these applications, existing methods can become unstable and often struggle to provide reliable results. In this article, we introduce a fully conditional specification (FCS) approach to multilevel MI that combines single-level imputation methods with group means (GM) or adjusted group means (AGM) to accommodate the multilevel structure. Based on theoretical investigations and multiple simulation studies, we evaluated the performance of these methods across balanced and unbalanced designs and with larger numbers of variables. Our findings suggest that the AGM approach – though not the GM approach – performs well across most scenarios we investigated and can even outperform conventional multilevel MI approaches in challenging applications. We also provide an illustrative example of implementing these methods in a simulated setting and discuss the implications of our findings for practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grund et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7ccf7d48f933b5eed8f0bhttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02915-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multiple Imputation of Missing Data for Multilevel Models2017 · 229 citations
  2. 2Substantive model compatible multilevel multiple imputation: A joint modeling approach2022 · 14 citations
  3. 3Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys1987 · 20,920 citations
  4. 4A Comparison of Joint Model and Fully Conditional Specification Imputation for Multilevel Missing Data2017 · 31 citations
  5. 5Multiple imputation by chained equations for systematically and sporadically missing multilevel data2016 · 227 citations