This preprint reveals continuity failures in long-running LLM assistants, indicating an engineered approach is needed.
This preprint introduces a continuity-layer architecture for long-running LLM assistants. We argue that many apparent “memory” failures are continuity failures caused by lossy context mutation (summarization/truncation), missing state lineage, and non-deterministic recovery behavior. The paper presents a deterministic control-plane pattern using checkpointing, artifact-grounded rehydration, integrity/lineage/freshness validation, and fail-closed gating for state-critical transitions. We provide a concrete checkpoint schema, PASS/FAIL payload examples, and an evaluation protocol with baselines and metrics (rehydrate success, determinism rate, fail-closed coverage, false fail-closed rate, and recovery MTTR). Current evidence is scoped to literature-backed motivation and internal qualitative observations; quantitative benchmark publication is proposed as future work. Primary contribution: reframing “LLM memory” as an engineered continuity systems problem with auditable, testable controls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexis Covo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: