PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology1 citations

A randomized phase 2 study of enhanced AR blockade with enzalutamide in high-risk patients with biochemical relapse undergoing salvage radiation: Final results from RTOG 3506 (STEEL).

View Full Paper
EPEdwin M. PosadasHGH GaySPStephanie Pugh

Key Points

  • To investigate if enhanced androgen receptor blockade with enzalutamide improves outcomes for high-risk patients undergoing salvage radiotherapy after biochemical relapse.
  • Randomized phase 2 trial design
  • Participants were patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy
  • Interventions compared standard ADT with enzalutamide plus ADT
  • Progression free survival analyzed as primary outcome
  • SRT with enzalutamide improved progression free survival compared to standard ADT (HR=0.62)
  • Biochemical failure rate at 2 years was 11% with enzalutamide vs. 19% with standard ADT
  • Grade 3 adverse events were higher in enzalutamide group (30%) versus standard ADT (19%)

Abstract

156 Background: Patients with high-risk features who experience biochemical relapse (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) benefit from the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to salvage radiotherapy (SRT). We hypothesized that enhanced androgen receptor (AR) blockade (eARB) with enzalutamide would improve SRT outcomes for high-risk patients. Methods: Post-RP patients who had BCR (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) with at least 1 high-risk feature (Gleason 8-10, seminal vesicle invasion, pN1, persistent PSA >0.1 ng/mL after RP, and PSA ≥ 0.7 ng/mL) were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 24 months of standard ADT (sADT) with an LHRH analog (LHRHa) or eARB comprised of LHRHa + enzalutamide 160 mg daily. Progression free survival (PFS) was analyzed with progression defined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL or initiation of new therapy following SRT. Results: Between April 2019 and August 2022, 188 patients were enrolled. The patient characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Median age was 64 years. Nodal involvement (pN1), pT3a-b, and Gleason 9 were noted in 22%, 77%, and 52% of patients, respectively. Over 70% had ≥2 aggressive features. Median follow-up time at the time of this report was 34.6 months. Prostatic fossa and pelvic SRT were mandatory. Para-aortic radiotherapy (RT), and lymph node and prostatic fossa lesion RT boosts were left at the discretion of the radiation oncologist. The SRT+eARB arm had better PFS when compared to the SRT+sADT arm (HR=0.62, 80% CI: 0.42-0.91, one-sided p=0.052). The rate of biochemical failure at 2 years was 19% (95% CI: 12-28) in the SRT+sADT arm as compared to 11% (95% CI: 5-18) in the SRT+eARB arm. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) related to sADT vs. eARB were 19% vs. 30%, while Grade 4 AEs were 4% vs. 2%, respectively. The most common AEs (all grades, >15%) included hot flashes, fatigue, diarrhea, and decreased lymphocytes. The grade 3+ AEs (>3%) included decreased lymphocytes and hypertension. Conclusions: The addition of enzalutamide to standard ADT resulted in an improvement of PFS following SRT, warranting a phase 3 trial. The increase in toxicity was consistent with other studies of enzalutamide and did not identify new safety concerns. Clinical trial information: NCT03809000 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Posadas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd1dd48f933b5eed91cfhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.156
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper