This model introduces a preventive architecture for autism and intellectual disability, suggesting a new stability mechanism across various domains.
The Continuity Framework advances a preventive systems architecture for autism and intellectual disability service systems. It introduces a structual distinction between Cumulative Continuity Load (CCL) and Crumulative Regulatory Load (CRL) and conceptualizes Continuity buffer Architectures as a cross-domain stabilization mechanism operating across regulatory, relational, environmental, governance, and lifespan domains. Rather than treating crisis as event-driven or behaviorally rooted, the model defines destabilization as a threshold condition emerging when cumilative exceeds available stabilization capacity. A formal structual expression of developmental accessibility is proposed, alongside the Continuity Load Assesment Tool (CLAT), a conceptual instrument intended for pilot implementation and longitudinal validation. Positioned as an open conceptual archiecture, the model advances a bounded and falsifiable structual proposition and invites interdisciplinary empirical testing across service, housing, and governance systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nancy T. Kokshoorn (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: