PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Insights into Imaging0 citationsOpen Access

Classification of incidental findings in polytrauma computed tomography

DKDaniela KildalRBRainer BraunschweigSRStefan Reske

Key Points

  • The aim is to establish a standardized classification for incidental findings in polytrauma cases.
  • Proposed a classification system for incidental findings in WBCT scans.
  • Categorized findings into 5 distinct categories labeled IF-RADS 1-5.
  • Analyzed the occurrence of incidental findings alongside trauma-related findings.
  • Identified that incidental findings are as prevalent as trauma-related findings.
  • Introduced five categories to systematically classify incidental findings.

Abstract

In polytrauma, IFs are as common as trauma-related findings. There is a need for standardized classification. For IFs in WBCT scans, we propose a classification into 5 categories, labeled as IF-RADS 1-5.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kildal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd2ad48f933b5eed9435https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02229-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper