PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Water Air & Soil Pollution0 citationsOpen Access

Unveiling the Effects of Polypropylene Microplastics (PP-MPs) on Growth Attributes and Antioxidant Defense System in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

KSKübra SevgiBilecik UniversityBSBüşra SevgiBilecik UniversitySLSema LeblebiciBilecik University

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the effects of different levels of polypropylene microplastics on wheat growth and antioxidant defenses.
  • Tested concentrations of PP-MPs: 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1%.
  • Measured growth attributes such as shoot and root length.
  • Analyzed oxidative stress markers like malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide.
  • Assessed antioxidant enzyme activities including SOD, POD, CAT, and APX.
  • 0.05% PP-MPs showed no effect on wheat growth.
  • 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1% PP-MPs inhibited shoot and root growth.
  • Higher PP-MP levels increased oxidative stress and MDA content.
  • Significant reduction was observed in chlorophyll and protein content at higher concentrations.

Abstract

Abstract Microplastics (MPs), as emerging pollutants in soil ecosystems, are increasingly alarming and present severe environmental threats to crop plants. Despite the elevated pollution of MPs in terrestrial ecosystems, the impact of polypropylene microplastics (PP-MPs) on plant growth and physiology has not been clearly elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to reveal the effects of different levels of polypropylene microplastics (0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1% PP-MPs) on wheat, one of the world's foremost crops. While 0.05% PP microplastic did not affect plant growth, 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1% PP microplastic pollution resulted in inhibition of shoot and root growth attributes. Stunted plant growth was accompanied by oxidative stress, as indicated by increased malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) content in this study. Higher levels of PP-MPs (0.5% and 1% PP) notably reduced photosynthetic pigment contents (chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b , total chlorophyll, and carotenoid) and total protein amount. Furthermore, exposure to higher concentrations of PP-MPs induced an increase in proline content, superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities to reduce the harmful effects of oxidative stress. The overall pattern of this study demonstrated that 0.05% PP-MPs had no adverse effect on wheat, but higher PP-MP contamination led to detrimental effects. These findings encourage addressing issues associated with microplastic pollution in crop plants and ultimately highlight the importance of plastic waste management for sustainable agriculture in soils.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sevgi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd3dd48f933b5eed95a1https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-026-09187-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Polypropylene Microplastics and Cadmium: Unveiling the Key Impacts of Co-Pollution on Wheat–Soil Systems from Multiple Perspectives2025
  2. 2Effects of Microplastic Pollution on Growth, Photosynthesis, and Nutritional Composition of Maize ( Zea mays L.)2026
  3. 3Impact of Microplastics on Fagopyrum esculentum: Altered Soil and Plant Responses2026
  4. 4Polyethylene Microplastic-Induced Changes in Soil Properties Mediate Nutrient Accumulation and Growth of Amaranthus tricolor L.2026
  5. 5Effects of Biodegradable Poly (Butylene Adipate‐Co‐Terephthalate) Microplastics on Grain Quality and Defense Mechanism of Wheat2025