Retrospective analysis examines weight changes during treatment in patients with metastatic lung cancer, suggesting implications for therapy outcomes.
Purpose In studies, weight loss is strongly associated with outcomes in metastatic non-squamous cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). This work examines weight variations in first-line treatment, exploring their mechanisms based on treatment type, age, sex, weight loss and excess weight before treatment. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing first-line treatment. Weight was recorded at four points: before treatment (Wbe), day one of treatment (Wd1), three months into immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment or maintenance (W3mo), and at progression diagnosis (Wpro). Results Among patients (n=198), 47% received chemotherapy (CT) with ICIs, 26% CT alone, and 27% ICIs alone. At Wd1, 32% were overweight/obese (Body mass index kg/m2) (BMI ≥25). Weight loss ≥ 5% before treatment was observed in 37%. Mean (SD) weight variations between Wd1 and W3mo were -1.1% (4.6) (CT), -0.2% (7.1) (CT+ICIs), and +0.4% (7.7) (ICIs alone) (P = 0.52). Patients older than 70 compared to ≤70 lost more weight between Wd1 and Wpro (-4.7% vs. -0.4%) (P = 0.019). Patients with pre-treatment weight loss ≥ 5% compared to those without weight loss stabilized or gained weight during treatment (+2.1% vs. -1.5%) (P = 0.009). Patients with BMI ≥25 lost more weight during treatment than those with BMI <25 (-1.4% vs. +0.8%) (P = 0.024). Conclusion Weight variations did not differ significantly across treatment types. Older patients are nutritionally more vulnerable. Pre-treatment significant weight loss ≥ 5% patients stabilized or gained weight during treatment, unlike those without initial weight loss. Pre-treatment weight loss in first-line mNSCLC supports, rather than contraindicates, cancer therapy. Higher BMI was associated with greater weight loss during treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gravian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: