This contribution challenges assumptions about access in disability research, highlighting complex participation dynamics among visually impaired individuals.
Debates around access in disability research often assume it is either available or denied -- secured by ramps, protocols, or permissions. This contribution challenges that binary by tracing how access is enacted, strained, and withdrawn through the ordinary labour of fieldwork. Drawing from research in coastal environments with visually impaired participants, I introduce the concept of routinings: shared, sensory practices like dressing, immersing, refusing, and navigating that shape how participation unfolds. These moments are emotionally charged, environmentally shaped, and often invisible to institutional logics. Routinings demand attention because they reveal access to be unstable, co-produced, and deeply relational. By foregrounding materiality, vulnerability, and the more-than-human, this piece joins growing calls for messy, embodied fieldwork -- and centres disabled people in that conversation. It raises a critical question: who is fieldwork designed for, and whose participation gets quietly routinised out?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadie; id_orcid 0009-0001-0572-9955 Rockliffe (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: