371 Background: The introduction of novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) has significantly transformed the systemic treatment landscape for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). However, ARSI therapy is associated with substantial adverse events (AEs) and increased medical costs. Dose reduction may offer a strategy to mitigate AEs and reduce costs, yet the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of reduced-dose ARSIs in nmCRPC remain unclear. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 251 patients with nmCRPC who received ARSI therapy. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the initial ARSI dose: reduced-dose group (n = 46) and full-dose group (n = 205). Prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were compared between groups. Monthly medical costs for first ARSI treatment were also evaluated. Results: The median age at nmCRPC diagnosis was 77 years, with a median follow-up of 46 months. The rates of any PSA response, PSA decline ≥50%, and PSA decline ≥90% were comparable between the full-dose and reduced-dose groups (85% vs. 89%, P = 0. 640; 74% vs. 76%, P = 0. 785; 46% vs. 35%, P = 0. 171, respectively). No significant differences were observed in PSA-PFS (P = 0. 307) or MFS (P = 0. 199) between the groups. After adjusting for confounding variables, reduced initial dose ARSI use was not significantly associated with shorter MFS (P = 0. 984; hazard ratio: 0. 992; 95% confidence interval: 0. 467–2. 107). The incidence of any-grade AEs and grade ≥3 AEs did not differ significantly between the groups (33% vs. 24%, P = 0. 171; 3. 9% vs. 4. 3%, P = 1. 000). Monthly medication costs for first ARSI treatment were significantly lower in the reduced-dose group compared to the full-dose group (998 vs. 1, 644, P < 0. 001), representing an approximate 40% cost reduction. Conclusions: Reduced-dose ARSI therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to full-dose treatment in patients with nmCRPC, while significantly lowering medication costs. Dose reduction may be a viable strategy to enhance cost-effectiveness without compromising clinical outcomes.
Fujita et al. (Sun,) studied this question.