PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Pollutants2 citationsOpen Access

Environmental Evaluation of VOC Emissions in CIPP Rehabilitation: Comparative Analysis of Resin Types and Curing Techniques

View Full Paper
RARasoul Adnan AbbasMNMohammad NajafiSZShima Zare

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate total VOC emissions from CIPP liners to address environmental concerns.
  • Collected air samples at six installation sites across the United States
  • Measured VOC concentrations before, during, and after CIPP installation and curing
  • Used multiple sampling methods, including photoionization detectors and Summa canisters
  • Compared measured concentrations with established occupational exposure limits
  • Styrene was the dominant VOC in work zones, with peak concentrations at 25.5 ppm during curing
  • VOC concentrations decreased significantly within five feet downwind from the work zone
  • Findings indicate limited public exposure risk while workers may face elevated short-term exposures

Abstract

Aging underground pipeline infrastructure across the United States, including systems used for potable water supply, wastewater collection, and stormwater conveyance, has exceeded its intended service life, emphasizing the need for replacement or rehabilitation to maintain reliable service to communities. Among available trenchless technologies, cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) is widely applied because it minimizes surface disruption and is well-suited for use in densely populated areas. Despite these advantages, environmental concerns remain regarding the release of total volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during CIPP installation and curing. This study evaluates total VOC emissions from CIPP liners under field conditions. Air samples were collected at six installation sites across the United States before, during, and after installation and curing to quantify key VOC species. Multiple sampling methods were employed, including photoionization detectors (PIDs), Summa canisters, and personal worker sampling. The measured compounds included styrene, cumene, acetophenone, hexane, toluene, and ethanol. Measured concentrations were compared with occupational exposure limits established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The results indicate that styrene was the dominant compound within active CIPP work zones, with peak concentrations reaching 25.5 ppm during curing. In contrast, VOC concentrations decreased substantially within five feet downwind of the work zone. Overall, the findings suggest that potential public exposure risks are limited, while workers directly involved in CIPP operations may experience elevated short-term exposures during installation and curing activities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abbas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd8cd48f933b5eeda109https://doi.org/10.3390/pollutants6010014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper