Accurate estimation of network density is central to egocentric social network analysis, yet existing survey-based methods require researchers to balance accuracy against participant burden and systematic recall bias. Traditional approaches, such as fixed-list name generators, tend to overrepresent salient ties. Although the more recent random sampling method yields better accuracy, it relies on exhaustive free recall, which can be cognitively demanding and impractical for researchers. In this study, we introduce and evaluate an alternative approach—incremental recall—that structures alter nomination across relationship categories to improve coverage of differing tie strengths while reducing respondent burden. Using a large-scale Monte Carlo simulation encompassing over 9 million egocentric networks, we compare incremental recall against traditional fixed-list recall and random sampling across a wide range of network sizes, compositions, and recall bias assumptions. Results show that the incremental recall method consistently outperforms traditional fixed-list recall and performs comparably to or better than random sampling under unbiased and moderately biased recall conditions. Performance advantages persist even when respondents are unable to provide the full number of alters specified by design. We further validate these findings using empirical egocentric network data from 103 participants. Treating observed networks as proxy ground truths, empirical results closely mirror the simulation patterns, confirming the robustness of incremental recall under real-world reporting conditions. These findings demonstrate that incremental recall addresses a central practical challenge in egocentric social network research: balancing feasibility and accuracy in density estimation. The proposed method maintains strong performance while substantially reducing respondent burden and simplifying administration for applied studies. For researchers conducting large scale surveys where network density is one of several measures, incremental recall provides a practical and validated alternative to exhaustive recall that maintains robustness to realistic reporting biases.
Davis et al. (2026) studied this question.